Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A1041/22TEY

29 Prince Arthur Ave

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Approved
Submitted: 19 September 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Minor variance (MV)
Addresses: 29 Prince Arthur Ave
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 19 September 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Approved
Hearing date: 7 December 2022
Decision: Approved
Objection at the hearing: Not recorded
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To alter the existing three-storey detached building by constructing a rear four-storey addition.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Francisca Quinn · registration SM33876
29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33876: 29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1041/22TEY at 29 Prince Arthur Ave: To alter the existing three-storey detached building by constructing a rear four-storey addition. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application
Matched fields
address
29-31 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
application_address
29 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
Francisca Quinn · registration SM33877
29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application
Evidence High confidence · score 0.93
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33877: 29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1041/22TEY at 29 Prince Arthur Ave: To alter the existing three-storey detached building by constructing a rear four-storey addition. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 29 - 31 Prince Arthur Ave. Support for minor variance application
Matched fields
address
29-31 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE
application_address
29 PRINCE ARTHUR AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Dianne Saxe1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Dianne Saxe	Member of council	1	1	6 December 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Angela Tsementzis Architect2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 11

16 lobbied · 354 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

Lobbied126
Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

Lobbied75% n=154
Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

Lobbied25%
Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

Lobbied19%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

Lobbied43%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Data table· 4 rows

Minor variance (MV), Ward 11: 16 lobbied and 354 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	16	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	354	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Objection rate
Lobbied	173	126	75% (n=154)	25%	19%	43%
Matched, unlobbied	3,646	114	91% (n=3,058)	9%	4%	27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.