Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A1039/17TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 26 September 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 26 Governor's Rd
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 26 September 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 27 June 2018
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a new two-storey detached dwelling with a two-car integral garage, a rear ground floor deck and front and rear second storey balconies.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
David Kwinter · registration SM26348
Consultation with councillor on behalf of client's minor variance request for a new home located at 26 Governors Road.
Evidence High confidence · score 0.94
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM26348: Consultation with councillor on behalf of client's minor variance request for a new home located at 26 Governors Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A1039/17TEY at 26 Governors Rd: To construct a new two-storey detached dwelling with a two-car integral garage, a rear ground floor deck and front and rear second storey balconies. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Consultation with councillor on behalf of client's minor variance request for a new home located at 26 Governors Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 26 GOVERNORS RD
- application_address
- 26 GOVERNORS RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.