Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0952/19TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 30 August 2019
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 99 Blue Jays Way
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 30 August 2019
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 15 January 2020
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the re-development scheme for a 45-storey mixed-use building permitted under Site-Specific By-law 1129-2010, by increasing the height of the tower, elevator shaft and mechanical penthouse.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM27025
99 Blue Jays Way
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM27025: 99 Blue Jays Way (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0952/19TEY at 99 Blue Jays Way: To alter the re-development scheme for a 45-storey mixed-use building permitted under Site-Specific By-law 1129-2010, by increasing the height of the tower, elevator shaft and mechanical penthouse. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 99 Blue Jays Way
Matched fields
- address
- 99 BLUE JAYS WAY
- application_address
- 99 BLUE JAYS WAY
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 99 BJW Residences LPSM27953 · 2 April 2019 · “99 Blue Jays Way.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.