Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0880/23TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 12 October 2023
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 1071 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 12 October 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 6 December 2023
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development standards for the 14-storey mixed-use building (approved under Site Specific Zoning By-Law 1262-2022(OLT)), by increasing the total gross floor area, increasing the height, increasing the number of storeys to 17-storeys, as well as reducing the number of required parking spaces. This building will provide a total of 278 rental units (including 6 affordable housing units), and commercial uses (to be located on the ground level).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Hullmark Asset Management · registration SM35244
General Engagement - Application being made for 1071 King Street West.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35244: General Engagement - Application being made for 1071 King Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0880/23TEY at 1071 King St W: To alter the development standards for the 14-storey mixed-use building (approved under Site Specific Zoning By-Law 1262-2022(OLT)), by increasing the total gross floor area, increasing the height, increasing the number of storeys to 17-storeys, as well as reducing the number of required parking sp… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: General Engagement - Application being made for 1071 King Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1071 KING ST W
- application_address
- 1071 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 3 September 2025 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM37575 · 16 April 2026 · “1071 King Street West”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM36324 · 4 February 2025 · “1071 King Street West.”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM35245 · 22 January 2024 · “1071 King Street West.”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33691 · 21 September 2022 · “1071 King Street West.”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33697 · 21 September 2022 · “1071 King Street West.”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33558 · 22 August 2022 · “1071 King Street West”
- Hullmark Asset ManagementSM33543 · 19 August 2022 · “1071 King Street West.”
- HullmarkSM33346 · 9 June 2022 · “1071 King Street West.”
- Hullmark Developments LimitedSM33057 · 14 March 2022 · “1071 King Street West”
- First capital RealtySM27382 · 18 January 2019 · “1071 King St. W.”
- Hullmark Developments LimitedSM26478 · 16 July 2018 · “1071 King Street West”
- First capital RealtySM23053 · 28 April 2016 · “1071 King St. W.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.