Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0814/18TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 22 August 2018
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 96-100 Ossington Avenue
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 22 August 2018
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 12 December 2018
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To legalize and maintain the second floor theatre space inside an existing two-storey commercial building. The existing ground floor commercial uses will be maintained. No exterior alterations are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Gust54 · registration SM28981
Working as a Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM28981: Working as a Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0814/18TEY at 96-100 Ossington Ave: To legalize and maintain the second floor theatre space inside an existing two-storey commercial building. The existing ground floor commercial uses will be maintained. No exterior alterations are proposed. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Working as a Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 96 OSSINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 96-100 OSSINGTON AVE
Gusto54 · registration SM28982
Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM28982: Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0814/18TEY at 96-100 Ossington Ave: To legalize and maintain the second floor theatre space inside an existing two-storey commercial building. The existing ground floor commercial uses will be maintained. No exterior alterations are proposed. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning Representative for a Minor Variance application for 96 Ossington Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 96 OSSINGTON AVE
- application_address
- 96-100 OSSINGTON AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Hullmark Developments LimitedSM27735 · 18 March 2019 · “96-100 Ossington Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.