Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0478/21TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 31 March 2021
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 737 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 31 March 2021
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 25 August 2021
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To build a new three-storey mixed-use building containing a commercial unit at grade and two residential units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1993525 Ontario Inc. · registration SM32130
minor variance application for 737 Bloor Street West, Toronto
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32130: minor variance application for 737 Bloor Street West, Toronto (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0478/21TEY at 737 Bloor St W: To build a new three-storey mixed-use building containing a commercial unit at grade and two residential units. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: minor variance application for 737 Bloor Street West, Toronto
Matched fields
- address
- 737 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 737 BLOOR ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Councillor Mike Layton | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 18 August 2021 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 1993525 Ontario Inc.SM37061 · 16 October 2025 · “737 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 11
16 lobbied · 354 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 354 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.