lobbyTO

Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)

Committee of Adjustment application A0448/24TEY

1141 Bloor St W

Ward 9 · Alejandra BravoDataset pageReport an error on this page
Status
Closed
Approved
Submitted
16 May 2024
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Minor variance (MV)
Addresses
1141 Bloor St W
Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted
16 May 2024
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Approved
Hearing date
7 August 2024
Decision
Approved
Objection at the hearing
Not recorded
Appealed
No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page

Description

To alter the development standards for Block A and Block B (containing Buildings A, B1, & B2, approved for 11, 34 and 37 storeys respectively) of the mixed-use redevelopment approved under Site Specific Zoning By-Law 700-2021 (OLT) by increasing the building height and number of dwelling units provided within mixed-use buildings A, B1 and B2. Also, to permit the reduction of parking spaces provided. There will be a total of 284 residential dwelling units within Block A and 859 residential dwelling units within Block B provided. This is currently under review by Site Plan Control Applications (22 129491 STE 09 SA, & 22 129524 STE 09 SA).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

27 lobbied · 333 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied169
  • Matched, unlobbied134

Approval rate

  • Lobbied67% n=27
  • Matched, unlobbied95% n=279

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied33%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied26%
  • Matched, unlobbied6%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied29%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9: 27 lobbied and 333 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2716967% (n=27)33%26%29%
Matched, unlobbied33313495% (n=279)5%6%30%
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.