lobbyTO

Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo

1141 Bloor St W

RegistrationsApplicationsReport an error on this page
Registrations naming this address
7
6 client organisations
Communications on those registrations
56
11 offices contacted
Applications at this address
16
16 published links to lobbying
Council and committee items
0
Items naming this address

About this address

Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Location
43.65926, -79.43644
How this address was located
Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.

Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points

Registrations that mention this address

7

These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.

Registrations by communications

Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address

  • Alejandra Bravo17
  • Alejandra Bravo17
  • Corporate Real Estate Management5
  • Ward 9 Davenport5
  • Mayor John Tory4
  • Councillor Ana Bailão3
  • City Planning1
  • Mayors Office1
Data table· 11 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Alejandra BravoCouncillor staff17126 June 2024
Alejandra BravoMember of council17136 June 2024
Corporate Real Estate ManagementCity staff5029 October 2024
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council5320 January 2022
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff417 November 2022
Councillor Ana BailãoCouncillor staff3220 January 2022
City PlanningCity staff1120 January 2022
Mayors OfficeCouncillor staff1110 March 2023
Office of Ana BailaoCouncillor staff1031 March 2022
Ward 18 DavenportMember of council111 February 2017
John ToryCouncillor staff1120 December 2022
All registrations· 7 rows
RegistrationClientAs writtenSubject matterDatesCommunications
SM34372Hazelview Developments1141 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development4 April 2023 – 31 December 202434
SM33120Hazelview1141 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development30 March 2022 – 30 March 20230
SM33121Hazelview1141 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development Application; Plan of Subdivision30 March 2022 – 7 October 20221
SM32526Fitzrovia Residential Inc.1141 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop…2 November 2021 – 2 November 202617
SM30257Capital Developments1141 Bloor Street WestAffordable Housing; Planning and Development23 June 2020 – 31 December 20210
SM29116Bloor Dufferin Development Limited Partnership1141 Bloor Street WestPlanning and Development, Combined Application4 November 2019 – 27 July 20213
SM23985Metropia1141 Bloor St WestAffordable Housing1 February 2017 – 8 February 20171

Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address

16
Data table· 16 rows
ApplicationTypeSubmittedStatus
26 122265 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)27 February 2026Under Review
In progress
26 122305 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)27 February 2026Under Review
In progress
B0064/24TEY
Committee of Adjustment application
Consent (severance) (CO)22 October 2024Closed
Approved
A0448/24TEY
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)16 May 2024Closed
Approved
23 226738 STE 09 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)16 November 2023Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
COA-5330148
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)5 September 2023Cancelled
Withdrawn
A0313/23TEY
Committee of Adjustment application
Minor variance (MV)24 March 2023Approved with Conditions
Approved
22 140155 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)29 April 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 140160 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)29 April 2022NOAC Issued
Approved
22 140164 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)29 April 2022Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
22 140172 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)29 April 2022NOAC Issued
Approved
22 129491 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)1 April 2022NOAC Issued
Approved
22 129524 STE 09 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)1 April 2022NOAC Issued
Approved
18 149098 STE 18 SA
Development application
Site Plan Approval (SA)26 April 2018Under Review
In progress
17 237256 STE 18 OZ
Development application
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)22 September 2017Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
17 237276 STE 18 SB
Development application
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB)22 September 2017Under Review
In progress

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Council and committee items naming this address

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9

20 lobbied · 21 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=4
  • Matched, unlobbied100% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied0%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9: 20 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied20—100% (n=4)0%0%0.05
Matched, unlobbied21—100% (n=5)0%0%0.10
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9

2 lobbied · 7 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide

26 lobbied · 179 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied184
  • Matched, unlobbied115

Approval rate

  • Lobbied79% n=24
  • Matched, unlobbied88% n=133

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied21%
  • Matched, unlobbied12%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied15%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied25%
Data table· 4 rows
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9: 2 lobbied and 7 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied7Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide: 26 lobbied and 179 matched unlobbied applications in 21 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2618479% (n=24)21%15%25%
Matched, unlobbied17911588% (n=133)12%3%25%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Committee of Adjustment applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Minor variance (MV), Ward 9

27 lobbied · 333 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied169
  • Matched, unlobbied134

Approval rate

  • Lobbied67% n=27
  • Matched, unlobbied95% n=279

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied33%
  • Matched, unlobbied5%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied26%
  • Matched, unlobbied6%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied29%
  • Matched, unlobbied30%

Minor variance (MV), City-wide

173 lobbied · 3,646 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied126
  • Matched, unlobbied114

Approval rate

  • Lobbied75% n=154
  • Matched, unlobbied91% n=3,058

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied25%
  • Matched, unlobbied9%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied19%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Objection rate

  • Lobbied43%
  • Matched, unlobbied27%
Data table· 4 rows
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9: 27 lobbied and 333 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied2716967% (n=27)33%26%29%
Matched, unlobbied33313495% (n=279)5%6%30%
Minor variance (MV), City-wide: 173 lobbied and 3,646 matched unlobbied applications in 103 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateObjection rate
Lobbied17312675% (n=154)25%19%43%
Matched, unlobbied3,64611491% (n=3,058)9%4%27%

Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9

19 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9: 19 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.

Development applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 9

1 lobbied · 3 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide

16 lobbied · 48 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 4 rows
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), Ward 9: 1 lobbied and 3 matched unlobbied applications in 1 matched stratum
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied1Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied3Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Draft Plan of Subdivision (SB), City-wide: 16 lobbied and 48 matched unlobbied applications in 15 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied16Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied48Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.