Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0290/25NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 25 June 2025
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 72 Church Ave
- Ward
- Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
- Submitted
- 25 June 2025
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 23 October 2025
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a four-storey apartment building with 14 residential units. This application was previously deferred at the Committee of Adjustment hearing on August 28, 2025.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
YOU GAN WEI and XIAO JING WANG · registration SM36840
Introduction of Minor Variance application for 72 Church Avenue, North York
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM36840: Introduction of Minor Variance application for 72 Church Avenue, North York (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0290/25NY at 72 Church Ave: To construct a four-storey apartment building with 14 residential units. This application was previously deferred at the Committee of Adjustment hearing on August 28, 2025. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Introduction of Minor Variance application for 72 Church Avenue, North York
Matched fields
- address
- 72 CHURCH AVE
- application_address
- 72 CHURCH AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lily Cheng | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 21 August 2025 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Jean WangSM35256 · 23 January 2024 · “72 Church Avenue”
- Yougan WeiSM34801 · 1 September 2023 · “72 Church Ave”
- Yougan Wei & Jean WangSM34778 · 24 August 2023 · “72 Church Ave.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 18
9 lobbied · 202 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 202 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.