Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0206/23SC
- Status
- Closed
- Refused
- Submitted
- 5 September 2023
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 756 Warden Ave
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 5 September 2023
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Refused
- Hearing date
- 3 April 2024
- Decision
- Refused
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct a new building with Electronic Gaming and Bingo Hall uses on the site. A previous minor variance application was approved to construct a new one storey industrial condominium (A0269/22SC). Cross reference related Site Plan Application File No. 2021 197589 ESC 20 SA. This application was previously deferred at the November 2023 & January 2024 hearing.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Dolphin Gaming · registration SM35634
Minor Variance - 756 Warden Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35634: Minor Variance - 756 Warden Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0206/23SC at 756 Warden Ave: To construct a new building with Electronic Gaming and Bingo Hall uses on the site. A previous minor variance application was approved to construct a new one storey industrial condominium (A0269/22SC). Cross reference related Site Plan Application File No. 2021 197589 ESC 20 SA. This application wa… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Minor Variance - 756 Warden Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 756 WARDEN AVE
- application_address
- 756 WARDEN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Frances Nunziata | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 8 August 2024 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Pantheon GroupSM22311 · 7 October 2015 · “756 Warden Avenue”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 20
9 lobbied · 295 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 9 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 295 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.