Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0189/17TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 17 February 2017
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 180 John St
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 17 February 2017
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 14 June 2017
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- No
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To convert the existing five-storey building to include office uses and to construct a three-storey addition (with mezzanine) above the fifth floor for office uses. In minor variance Decision A1199/15TEY the Committee approved the variances listed below with the exception of the variance request to not provide parking on-site (see item #6 in attached public notice).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
180 John Street Inc. · registration SM22837
180 John Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM22837: 180 John Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0189/17TEY at 180 John St: To convert the existing five-storey building to include office uses and to construct a three-storey addition (with mezzanine) above the fifth floor for office uses. In minor variance Decision A1199/15TEY the Committee approved the variances listed below with the exception of the variance request to… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 180 John Street
Matched fields
- address
- 180 JOHN ST
- application_address
- 180 JOHN ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 20 Trinity-Spadina | Member of council | 1 | 0 | 29 February 2016 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 10
20 lobbied · 261 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | 136 | 100% (n=20) | 0% | 0% | 14% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 261 | 138 | 93% (n=214) | 7% | 5% | 18% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.