Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0141/25TEY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 21 February 2025
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 1498 Dundas St W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 21 February 2025
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 23 April 2025
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 953-2021), for a new 8-storey mixed-use building, by increasing the gross floor area, and portions of the building heights, and by reducing the number of residential parking spaces. There will be a total of 62 residential dwelling units on this lot.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Block (Dundas) Developments Limited · registration SM36392
1494-1498 Dundas Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.85
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36392: 1494-1498 Dundas Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0141/25TEY at 1498 Dundas St W: To alter the development standards (as approved under Site Specific Zoning By-law 953-2021), for a new 8-storey mixed-use building, by increasing the gross floor area, and portions of the building heights, and by reducing the number of residential parking spaces. There will be a total of 62 residen… (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1494-1498 Dundas Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1494-1498 DUNDAS ST W
- application_address
- 1498 DUNDAS ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 4 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alejandra Bravo | Councillor staff | 4 | 0 | 21 March 2025 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.