Committee of Adjustment application · Minor variance (MV)
Committee of Adjustment application A0052/20NY
- Status
- Closed
- Approved
- Submitted
- 9 January 2020
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Minor variance (MV)
- Addresses
- 150 Kilgour Rd
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 9 January 2020
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Hearing date
- 17 September 2020
- Decision
- Approved
- Objection at the hearing
- Not recorded
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page
Description
To construct an addition at the rear side of the building on levels 4 and 5.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital · registration SM30521
A Minor Variance application for site located at 150 Kilgour Road.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.83
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30521: A Minor Variance application for site located at 150 Kilgour Road. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Committee of Adjustment application A0052/20NY at 150 Kilgour Rd: To construct an addition at the rear side of the building on levels 4 and 5. (Committee of Adjustment Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: A Minor Variance application for site located at 150 Kilgour Road.
Matched fields
- address
- 150 KILGOUR RD
- application_address
- 150 KILGOUR RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Robinson, Ward 15 | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 8 September 2020 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 15
5 lobbied · 419 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 5 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 419 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.