Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 26 127597 ESC 22 OZ

Ward 22 · Nick MantasDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 10 March 2026; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 2; 2 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1020 McNicoll Ave
Ward: Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted: 10 March 2026
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for a new 9-storey long-term care home with approximately 512 beds on the southern portion of the site and retaining the existing building on the north portion of the site.Please note that the applicant intends to submit a severance application that will sever the vacant southern portion of the site, which is the subject of the zoning application, from the existing building on the north portion of the site.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Tendercare Nursing Home Ltd. · registration SM37493
1020 McNicoll Avenue, Toronto, ON Rezoning, Site Plan Control
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM37493: 1020 McNicoll Avenue, Toronto, ON Rezoning, Site Plan Control (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 26 127597 ESC 22 OZ at 1020 Mcnicoll Ave: Proposal for a new 9-storey long-term care home with approximately 512 beds on the southern portion of the site and retaining the existing building on the north portion of the site.Please note that the applicant intends to submit a severance application that will sever the vacant southern portion o… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1020 McNicoll Avenue, Toronto, ON Rezoning, Site Plan Control
Matched fields
address
1020 MCNICOLL AVE
application_address
1020 MCNICOLL AVE

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 2 communications · 2 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Nick Mantas	Councillor staff	1	1	30 March 2026
Nick Mantas	Member of council	1	1	30 March 2026

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Extendicare
SM37451 · 3 March 2026 · “1020 McNicoll Avenue”
Tendercare Living Centre
SM31387 · 10 March 2021 · “1020 McNicoll Avenue.”
Tendercare Living Centre
SM31388 · 10 March 2021 · “1020 McNicoll Avenue.”
Tendercare Nursing Homes Ltd
SM28976 · 8 October 2019 · “1020 McNicoll Av”
Tendercare Nursing Homes Ltd
SM27028 · 16 November 2018 · “1020 McNicoll Av.”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	10	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.