Development application · Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)

Development application 25 209690 ESC 25 PL

1 Franklin Ave; 2 Franklin Ave; 4 Franklin Ave; 5 Franklin Ave; 7 Franklin Ave; 10 Franklin Ave; 6175 Kingston Rd; 6183 Kingston Rd

Ward 25 · Neethan ShanDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 13 August 2025; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Part Lot Control Exemption (PL)
Addresses: 1 Franklin Ave; 2 Franklin Ave; 4 Franklin Ave; 5 Franklin Ave; 7 Franklin Ave; 10 Franklin Ave; 6175 Kingston Rd; 6183 Kingston Rd
Ward: Ward 25 · Neethan Shan
Submitted: 13 August 2025
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Related file: 14 137827 ESC 44 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Part Lot Control Application for Lots 8 and 9 within the larger site. These two lots were initially submitted in another Part Lot Control Application ( File: 25 157257 ESC 25 PL) which is currently under review. A seperate application was required for Lots 8 and 9, so that a separate Part Lot Control By-law can be passed by Council unencumbered to the restrictive conditions that are to be imposed on the Draft Plan of Common Elements Condominium/Part Lot Control Applications with respect to the units being built out on Blocks 11 and 12 on the same subdivision plan (City Files: 25 157275 ESC 25 CD/ 25 157257 ESC 25 PL ).

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide

2 lobbied · 6 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Data table· 2 rows

Part Lot Control Exemption (PL), City-wide: 2 lobbied and 6 matched unlobbied applications in 2 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	2	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	6	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.