Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 189182 WET 07 OZ
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 7 July 2025
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 3100 Weston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
- Submitted
- 7 July 2025
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 125 units
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed Development comprising of three (3) blocks of 4-storey stacked townhouses. The Proposed Development contains 125 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
AvranceCorp Developments · registration SM35209
Assist client with planning and development application at 3100 Weston Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35209: Assist client with planning and development application at 3100 Weston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 189182 WET 07 OZ at 3100 Weston Rd: Proposed Development comprising of three (3) blocks of 4-storey stacked townhouses. The Proposed Development contains 125 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Assist client with planning and development application at 3100 Weston Road
Matched fields
- address
- 3100 WESTON RD
- application_address
- 3100 WESTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- AvranceCorp DevelopmentsSM35146 · 18 December 2023 · “3100 Weston Rd”
- AvranceCorp DevelopmentsSM35061 · 27 November 2023 · “3100 Weston Road”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7
7 lobbied · 8 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 8 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.