Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 25 183005 WET 03 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 24 June 2025
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 1233-1255 The Queensway
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 24 June 2025
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Revised Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application to redesignate the lands from Mixed Use Areas to Mixed Use Areas and Parks, add new Site and Area Specific Policies, and add three new planned but unbuilt roads. Density and heights are not included in this OPA.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Fig Tree Construction Ltd. · registration SM37367
City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containing approximately 500,000 square metres of GFA, …
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37367: City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containing approximately 500,000 square metres of GFA, two park blocks, and two new streets. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 183005 WET 03 OZ at 1233-1255 The Queensway: Revised Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application to redesignate the lands from Mixed Use Areas to Mixed Use Areas and Parks, add new Site and Area Specific Policies, and add three new planned but unbuilt roads. Density and heights are not included in this OPA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containi…
Matched fields
- file_number
- 25 183005 WET 03 OZ
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Fig Tree Construction Ltd. · registration SM37358
City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containing approximately 500,000 square metres of GFA, …
Evidence High confidence · score 1.00
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37358: City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containing approximately 500,000 square metres of GFA, two park blocks, and two new streets. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 183005 WET 03 OZ at 1233-1255 The Queensway: Revised Official Plan Amendment (OPA) application to redesignate the lands from Mixed Use Areas to Mixed Use Areas and Parks, add new Site and Area Specific Policies, and add three new planned but unbuilt roads. Density and heights are not included in this OPA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: City File No 25 183005 WET 03 OZ, Official Plan Amendment application for 1233-1255 The Queensway to allow for six mixed-use development blocks containi…
Matched fields
- file_number
- 25 183005 WET 03 OZ
Notes
The registration names this application's file number.
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 6 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amber Morley | Councillor staff | 4 | 2 | 2 February 2026 |
| Amber Morley | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 2 February 2026 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 19% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.