Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 25 155173 ESC 20 CD
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Approved
- Submitted
- 6 May 2025
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 1161 Kingston Rd
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 6 May 2025
- Status
- Draft Plan Approved
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 56 units
- Related file
- 20 230414 ESC 20 SA
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for a mixed-use condominium atop two levels of underground garage. There are 56 Residential Units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1161 Kingston Road Limited Partnership · registration SM35132
Timeliness of and process-related issues pertaining to ongoing site plan approval conditions, and subsequent construction permitting for new condominium development located at 1161 Kingston Road, Sca…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35132: Timeliness of and process-related issues pertaining to ongoing site plan approval conditions, and subsequent construction permitting for new condominium development located at 1161 Kingston Road, Scarborough. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 25 155173 ESC 20 CD at 1161 Kingston Rd: Proposal for a mixed-use condominium atop two levels of underground garage. There are 56 Residential Units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: …ngoing site plan approval conditions, and subsequent construction permitting for new condominium development located at 1161 Kingston Road, Scarborough.
Matched fields
- address
- 1161 KINGSTON RD
- application_address
- 1161 KINGSTON RD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 2 communications · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Parthi Kandavel | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 31 January 2024 |
| Parthi Kandavel | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 23 January 2024 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.