Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 24 245745 NNY 17 OZ
55 Smooth Rose Crt; 2135 Sheppard Ave E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 2 December 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 55 Smooth Rose Crt; 2135 Sheppard Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 17 · Shelley Carroll
- Submitted
- 2 December 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 471 units; 31,520 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 12 126689 NNY 33 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
OPA & Rezoning proposes a new residential tower (Building "A") with a height of 43-storeys. The proposal contemplates a total gross floor area of 31519.8 square metres and a density of 5.24 Floor Space Index across the gross site area of the Parkside Square lands. The proposal includes a total of 471 residential units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Tribute CommunitiesSM27323 · 10 January 2019 · “2135 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM24026 · 10 February 2017 · “2135 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Tribute CommunitiesSM24015 · 8 February 2017 · “2135 Sheppard Avenue East”
- Hiltin Hills Developments Inc.SM17931 · 22 March 2012 · “2135 Sheppard Avenue East.”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 17
13 lobbied · 16 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 13 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 16 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.