Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 24 238898 STE 12 OZ
2004 Bathurst St; 2006 Bathurst St; 2008 Bathurst St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 14 November 2024
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2004 Bathurst St; 2006 Bathurst St; 2008 Bathurst St
- Ward
- Ward 12 · Josh Matlow
- Submitted
- 14 November 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 86 units; 15,150 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Jan 2026 Resubmission: to include 7 rental replacement units. No built form or massing changes made to the proposal. The number of dwelling units have increased to 71 total. Dec 2025 Resubmission: for a 72.3- metre (19-storey), plus a Mech. Penthouse and amenity level, mixed-use building, with a maximum permitted gross floor area of 15,150 square metres, and a minimum required commercial-retail space of 300 square metres. The proposal is to contain 70 dwelling units. Oct 2025 Resubmission: for a 72.3- metre (19-storey), plus a Mech. Penthouse and amenity level, mixed-use building, with a maximum permitted gross floor area of 15,150 square metres, and a commercial-retail space of 300 square metres on the ground floor, with residential above. The proposal is to contain 70 dwelling units. Combined Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application for a 63.7- metre, plus Mech. Penthouse (17 storeys) mixed-use building, with a maximum permitted gross floor area of 13,800 square metres, and a min. commercial-retail space of 300 square metres on the ground floor, with residential above. The proposal is to contain 86 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Orchard West Real Estate Group · registration SM37444
2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA & rezoning application
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37444: 2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA & rezoning application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 238898 STE 12 OZ at 2004 Bathurst St: Jan 2026 Resubmission: to include 7 rental replacement units. No built form or massing changes made to the proposal. The number of dwelling units have increased to 71 total. Dec 2025 Resubmission: for a 72.3- metre (19-storey), plus a Mech. Penthouse and amenity level, mixed-use building, with a ma… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA & rezoning application
Matched fields
- address
- 2002-2008 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 2008 BATHURST ST
Orchard West Real Estate Group · registration SM37445
2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA and rezoning application
Evidence High confidence · score 0.95
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM37445: 2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA and rezoning application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 24 238898 STE 12 OZ at 2004 Bathurst St: Jan 2026 Resubmission: to include 7 rental replacement units. No built form or massing changes made to the proposal. The number of dwelling units have increased to 71 total. Dec 2025 Resubmission: for a 72.3- metre (19-storey), plus a Mech. Penthouse and amenity level, mixed-use building, with a ma… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 2002-2008 Bathurst Street OPA and rezoning application
Matched fields
- address
- 2002-2008 BATHURST ST
- application_address
- 2008 BATHURST ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Josh Matlow | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 24 March 2026 |
| Josh Matlow | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 12 March 2026 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 12
44 lobbied · 60 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 44 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 14% | 0.02 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 60 | — | 100% (n=9) | 0% | 10% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.