lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 24 218914 STE 09 OZ

450 Dufferin St

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
27 September 2024
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
3
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
84
12 meetings · 9 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
450 Dufferin St
Ward
Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
Submitted
27 September 2024
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
175 units
Related file
22 236510 STE 09 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan Amendment for an 18-storey mixed-use development containing 364 square metres of employment uses at-grade and 12,189 square of metres of residential gross floor area including 175 purpose-built residential rental units above. This application is also tied to an Employment Land Conversion Request that was conisdered by City Council and approved through Official Plan Amendment 591.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

3 linked registrations · 84 communications · 12 meetings · 9 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 11 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Alejandra BravoCouncillor staff22310 April 2026
Olivia ChowCouncillor staff22319 May 2026
Development Review DivisionCity staff13214 August 2025
Development ReviewCity staff1104 March 2025
Economic Development and CultureCity staff607 October 2024
Development Review DivisonCity staff308 August 2025
Alejandra BravoMember of council3215 January 2025
Development and Growth ServicesCity staff1015 January 2025
Dianne SaxeCouncillor staff1128 March 2023
Dianne SaxeMember of council1128 March 2023
Mike ColleCouncillor staff105 October 2023

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9

19 lobbied · 28 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9: 19 lobbied and 28 matched unlobbied applications in 16 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied19Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied28Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.