Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 24 216386 STE 09 SA
0 Bloor St W; 17 Dora Ave; 1319 Bloor St W
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 23 September 2024
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 0 Bloor St W; 17 Dora Ave; 1319 Bloor St W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 23 September 2024
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
This site plan control application is for the propossed Bloor Lansdowne Smart Track GO Station, which consists of the main station building, platforms, and Maintenance Building located at the south end of the platforms at Dora Avenue. Cross-Reference 1319 Bloor Street West - Site Plan Control Application 21 205938 STE 09 SA
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Kingsett CapitalSM30886 · 25 November 2020 · “1319 Bloor Street West.”
- Kingsett CapitalSM30887 · 25 November 2020 · “1319 Bloor Street West.”
- Kingsett CapitalSM30539 · 8 September 2020 · “1319 Bloor Street West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.