Address · Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
1319 Bloor St W
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Location
- 43.65741, -79.44432
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
3These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Office of Councillor Bailao, Ward 9 | Councillor staff | 2 | 0 | 25 November 2020 |
All registrations· 3 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM30886 | Kingsett Capital | 1319 Bloor Street West. | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 25 November 2020 – 26 May 2021 | 1 |
| SM30887 | Kingsett Capital | 1319 Bloor Street West. | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 25 November 2020 – 28 May 2021 | 1 |
| SM30539 | Kingsett Capital | 1319 Bloor Street West | Planning and Development Application; Zoning By-law | 8 September 2020 – 2 April 2023 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
6- Submitted 3 September 2025Consent (severance) (CO)Committee of Adjustment application B0054/25TEYConditional Consent · Approved
- Submitted 2 April 2025Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0222/25TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 23 September 2024Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 24 216386 STE 09 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 16 August 2024Minor variance (MV)Committee of Adjustment application A0760/24TEYClosed · Approved
- Submitted 30 August 2021Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 21 205938 STE 09 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 18 December 2020Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 20 230587 STE 09 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 6 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| B0054/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Consent (severance) (CO) | 3 September 2025 | Conditional Consent Approved |
| A0222/25TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 2 April 2025 | Closed Approved |
| 24 216386 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 23 September 2024 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| A0760/24TEY Committee of Adjustment application | Minor variance (MV) | 16 August 2024 | Closed Approved |
| 21 205938 STE 09 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 30 August 2021 | Under Review In progress |
| 20 230587 STE 09 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 December 2020 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
1319 Bloor St W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
21 205938 STE 09 SA · submitted 30 August 2021 · Under Review · from registration SM30539 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30539: 1319 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 205938 STE 09 SA at 1319 Bloor St W: Site Plan Approval for a mixed-use building comprised of two towers having heights of 31 and 33-storeys atop a podium ranging in height between 4 and 7-storeys. The proposed residential gross floor area is 56,876.46 square metres, and the proposed non-residential gross floor area is 1212.42 square … (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1319 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
1319 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 230587 STE 09 OZ · submitted 18 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30539 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30539: 1319 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230587 STE 09 OZ at 1319 Bloor St W: Proposal for the development of 31-storey and 33-storey towers atop a podium which varies in height from 4-7storeys. The proposed non-residential gross floor area is 1200 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area is 59238 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1319 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
- address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
1319 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 230587 STE 09 OZ · submitted 18 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30886 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30886: Rezoning application and planning and community engagement related matters for a proposed development at 1319 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230587 STE 09 OZ at 1319 Bloor St W: Proposal for the development of 31-storey and 33-storey towers atop a podium which varies in height from 4-7storeys. The proposed non-residential gross floor area is 1200 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area is 59238 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application and planning and community engagement related matters for a proposed development at 1319 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
1319 Bloor St W · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
20 230587 STE 09 OZ · submitted 18 December 2020 · Closed · from registration SM30887 (Kingsett Capital)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30887: Rezoning application and planning and community engagement related matters for a proposed development at 1319 Bloor Street West. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 20 230587 STE 09 OZ at 1319 Bloor St W: Proposal for the development of 31-storey and 33-storey towers atop a podium which varies in height from 4-7storeys. The proposed non-residential gross floor area is 1200 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area is 59238 square metres. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Rezoning application and planning and community engagement related matters for a proposed development at 1319 Bloor Street West.
Matched fields
- address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
- application_address
- 1319 BLOOR ST W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Consent (severance) (CO), Ward 9
2 lobbied · 7 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Consent (severance) (CO), City-wide
26 lobbied · 179 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 2 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 7 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 26 | 184 | 79% (n=24) | 21% | 15% | 25% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 179 | 115 | 88% (n=133) | 12% | 3% | 25% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Committee of Adjustment applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Minor variance (MV), Ward 9
27 lobbied · 333 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Minor variance (MV), City-wide
173 lobbied · 3,646 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Objection rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 27 | 169 | 67% (n=27) | 33% | 26% | 29% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 333 | 134 | 95% (n=279) | 5% | 6% | 30% |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Objection rate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 173 | 126 | 75% (n=154) | 25% | 19% | 43% |
| Matched, unlobbied | 3,646 | 114 | 91% (n=3,058) | 9% | 4% | 27% |
Submission to hearing. Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 9
19 lobbied · 28 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 19 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 28 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.