lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 24 126134 ESC 21 OZ

123 Bellamy Rd N

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
15 March 2024
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
0
None published
Communications on linked registrations
0

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
123 Bellamy Rd N
Ward
Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
Submitted
15 March 2024
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
1,172 units; 97,115 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

The proposal contemplates the addition of three buildings with 44-, 35- and 9-storeys in height on the eastern portion of the subject site while retaining the existing 12-storey apartment building. Building A and B will be connected with a podium ranging in height from 2- to 6-storeys. Building C will be a standalone mid-rise building ranging in height from 4- to 9-storeys. The proposed buildings will have a total gross floor area of 66,466 square metres and when combined with the gross floor area of the existing building, will result in an overall gross floor area of 97,115 square metres and overall density of 5.15 floor space index (FSI). The proposal contemplates a unit count of 465 units for Building A, 353 units for Building B, and 104 units for Building C, which when combined with the unit count of 250 units for the existing building, will result in an overall unit count of 1,172 units.The proposal also contemplates a parking count of 415 long term spaces and 106 short term parking spaces for the proposed new buildings, which when combined with existing parking count of 149 spaces, will result in an overall parking count of 658 spaces. The proposal also provides a total of 704 bicycle parking spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21

15 lobbied · 21 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21: 15 lobbied and 21 matched unlobbied applications in 12 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied15Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied21Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.