Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 23 210768 WET 05 OZ

2330 Eglinton Ave W; 2400 Eglinton Ave W

Ward 5 · Frances NunziataDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 4 October 2023; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 2330 Eglinton Ave W; 2400 Eglinton Ave W
Ward: Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
Submitted: 4 October 2023
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

This application will provide an Amendment to the Official Plan for the lands designated as 2400 Eglinton Avenue West. The subject lands are designated as Mixed-Use Areas in the Official Plan. They are also designated as Block A of "Certain Lands in the vicinity of Eglinton Avenue West and Gabian Way" per OPA 253, in line with the Eglinton Connects Study. The Amendment proposes a new Site and Area Specific Policy for Block A that is fully aligned with the direction already provided in OPA 253 for Block A but providing further definition and details for key elements of site development including built form, phasing, public rights-of-way, and public realm.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

SmartCentres REIT
SM34160 · 8 February 2023 · “2400 Eglinton Avenue West”
SmartCentres REIT
SM34244 · 2 January 2023 · “2400 Eglinton Avenue West”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5

12 lobbied · 17 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5: 12 lobbied and 17 matched unlobbied applications in 9 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	12	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	17	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.