Address · Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
2400 Eglinton Ave W
- Communications on those registrations
- 0
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 5 · Frances Nunziata
- Location
- 43.69216, -79.46718
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
2These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
No communications recorded.
All registrations· 2 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM34160 | SmartCentres REIT | 2400 Eglinton Avenue West | Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Develop… | 8 February 2023 – 8 February 2027 | 0 |
| SM34244 | SmartCentres REIT | 2400 Eglinton Avenue West | Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law; Planning and Development Application, Site Plan | 2 January 2023 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
4- Submitted 4 October 2023Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 23 210768 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 28 November 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 234090 WET 05 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 2 February 2021Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 21 111665 WET 05 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 14 March 2013Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 13 133545 WET 12 SAClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 4 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23 210768 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 4 October 2023 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 22 234090 WET 05 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 28 November 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 21 111665 WET 05 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 2 February 2021 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 13 133545 WET 12 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 14 March 2013 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
2322 Eglinton Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 234090 WET 05 SA · submitted 28 November 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34160 (SmartCentres REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34160: Toronto Westside Mall 2400 Eglinton Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 234090 WET 05 SA at 2322 Eglinton Ave W: Development of the Caledonia GO Station, owned and operated by Metrolinx.Proposed station is connected to Caledonia ECLRT station -- refer to Site Plan File No. 13 133545 WET 12 SA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Toronto Westside Mall 2400 Eglinton Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 2400 EGLINTON AVE W
- application_address
- 2400 EGLINTON AVE W
2322 Eglinton Ave W · Site Plan Approval (SA)
22 234090 WET 05 SA · submitted 28 November 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34244 (SmartCentres REIT)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.70
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34244: Toronto Westside Mall, 2400 Eglinton Avenue West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 234090 WET 05 SA at 2322 Eglinton Ave W: Development of the Caledonia GO Station, owned and operated by Metrolinx.Proposed station is connected to Caledonia ECLRT station -- refer to Site Plan File No. 13 133545 WET 12 SA. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Toronto Westside Mall, 2400 Eglinton Avenue West
Matched fields
- address
- 2400 EGLINTON AVE W
- application_address
- 2400 EGLINTON AVE W
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 5
12 lobbied · 17 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 5
15 lobbied · 40 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 40 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.