Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 23 164446 NNY 08 SA
60 Apex Rd; 68 Apex Rd; 3140 Dufferin St; 3150 Dufferin St; 3170 Dufferin St
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 21 June 2023
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 60 Apex Rd; 68 Apex Rd; 3140 Dufferin St; 3150 Dufferin St; 3170 Dufferin St
- Ward
- Ward 8 · Mike Colle
- Submitted
- 21 June 2023
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Related file
- 23 164435 NNY 08 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
—
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust · registration SM36508
3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.74
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36508: 3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 164446 NNY 08 SA at 3140 Dufferin St: (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road
Matched fields
- address
- 3140-3170 DUFFERIN ST
- application_address
- 3140 DUFFERIN ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 6 communications · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mike Colle | Member of council | 6 | 0 | 8 August 2025 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 8
25 lobbied · 69 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 25 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 8% | 0.00 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 69 | — | 100% (n=2) | 0% | 4% | 0.00 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.