Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 23 164435 NNY 08 OZ

60 Apex Rd; 68 Apex Rd; 3140 Dufferin St; 3150 Dufferin St; 3170 Dufferin St

Ward 8 · Mike ColleDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 21 June 2023; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 10; 4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 60 Apex Rd; 68 Apex Rd; 3140 Dufferin St; 3150 Dufferin St; 3170 Dufferin St
Ward: Ward 8 · Mike Colle
Submitted: 21 June 2023
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,186 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development with four towers of 16, 17, 22, and 31 storeys, 1,186 dwelling units, and 1,420 m2 of retail space. **NOTE concurrent Draft Plan of Subdivision application 21 203753 NNY 08 SB, Zoning By-law Amendment application 21 203752 NNY 08 OZ, and Site Plan application 23 164446 NNY 08 SA.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust · registration SM36508
3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.87
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36508: 3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 164435 NNY 08 OZ at 3140 Dufferin St: Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development with four towers of 16, 17, 22, and 31 storeys, 1,186 dwelling units, and 1,420 m2 of retail space. **NOTE concurrent Draft Plan of Subdivision application 21 203753 NNY 08 SB, Zoning By-law Amendment application 21 203752 NNY 08… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3140-3170 Dufferin Street and 60-68 Apex Road
Matched fields
address
3140-3170 DUFFERIN ST
application_address
3140 DUFFERIN ST
RioCan Real Estate Investment Trust · registration SM35827
3140 & 3180 Dufferin Street Applications
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35827: 3140 & 3180 Dufferin Street Applications (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 164435 NNY 08 OZ at 3140 Dufferin St: Official Plan Amendment application to permit a mixed-use development with four towers of 16, 17, 22, and 31 storeys, 1,186 dwelling units, and 1,420 m2 of retail space. **NOTE concurrent Draft Plan of Subdivision application 21 203753 NNY 08 SB, Zoning By-law Amendment application 21 203752 NNY 08… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 3140 & 3180 Dufferin Street Applications
Matched fields
address
3140&3180 DUFFERIN ST
application_address
3140 DUFFERIN ST

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 10 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Mike Colle	Member of council	8	2	8 August 2025
Mike Colle	Councillor staff	2	2	8 August 2024

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8

33 lobbied · 57 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=2
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied27%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 8: 33 lobbied and 57 matched unlobbied applications in 22 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	33	—	100% (n=2)	0%	12%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	57	—	100% (n=3)	0%	27%	0.03

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.