Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 23 138662 WET 03 SA
5 Jopling Ave S; 7 Jopling Ave S; 9 Jopling Ave S
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 27 April 2023
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 5 Jopling Ave S; 7 Jopling Ave S; 9 Jopling Ave S
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 27 April 2023
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 438 units; 25,947 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 22 194681 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application for a 39-storey mixed-use building (128.00 m-tall incl. MPH, 25,947 sqm total GFA - 210 sqm non-res GFA) with 438 dwelling units (110 - 2bd, 44 -3bd), 1752 sqm of amenity space and 32 parking spaces (6 visitor, 26 residential).
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM35582
5-9 Jopling Ave S
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35582: 5-9 Jopling Ave S (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 138662 WET 03 SA at 5 Jopling Ave S: Site Plan Control application for a 39-storey mixed-use building (128.00 m-tall incl. MPH, 25,947 sqm total GFA - 210 sqm non-res GFA) with 438 dwelling units (110 - 2bd, 44 -3bd), 1752 sqm of amenity space and 32 parking spaces (6 visitor, 26 residential). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5-9 Jopling Ave S
Matched fields
- address
- 5-9 JOPLING AVE S
- application_address
- 5 JOPLING AVE S
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,237 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | 1,629 | 70% (n=10) | 30% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=61) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,237 | 727 | 97% (n=96) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.