Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 23 120562 STE 11 SA

Ward 11 · Dianne SaxeDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 6 March 2023; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 0 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type: Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses: 15 Bloor St W; 19 Bloor St W
Ward: Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
Submitted: 6 March 2023
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,262 units
Related file: 23 120557 STE 11 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Approval for a 94-storey mixed-use building containing retail uses at-grade fronting onto Bloor Street West, and residential uses above (1262 residential units) with access provided on Balmuto Street. The proposed development provides 4 levels of underground parking for a total of 70 parking spaces including residential and visitor parking, as well as car-share and dedicated short-term pick-up/drop-off spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Reserve Properties Limited · registration SM35423
Discussions pertaining to 15-19 Bloor Street West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35423: Discussions pertaining to 15-19 Bloor Street West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 120562 STE 11 SA at 15 Bloor St W: Site Plan Approval for a 94-storey mixed-use building containing retail uses at-grade fronting onto Bloor Street West, and residential uses above (1262 residential units) with access provided on Balmuto Street. The proposed development provides 4 levels of underground parking for a total of 70 park… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussions pertaining to 15-19 Bloor Street West
Matched fields
address
15-19 BLOOR ST W
application_address
15 BLOOR ST W
Reserve Properties Limited · registration SM35413
To support a Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw change for a development application at 15 to 19 Bloor St West
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35413: To support a Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw change for a development application at 15 to 19 Bloor St West (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 23 120562 STE 11 SA at 15 Bloor St W: Site Plan Approval for a 94-storey mixed-use building containing retail uses at-grade fronting onto Bloor Street West, and residential uses above (1262 residential units) with access provided on Balmuto Street. The proposed development provides 4 levels of underground parking for a total of 70 park… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: To support a Official Plan Amendment and Zoning Bylaw change for a development application at 15 to 19 Bloor St West
Matched fields
address
19 BLOOR ST W
application_address
19 BLOOR ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 1 communication · 0 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Dianne Saxe1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Dianne Saxe	Member of council	1	0	18 March 2024

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Mihevc Consulting and Mediation1 registration
Sussex Strategy Group Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11

46 lobbied · 113 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=3
Matched, unlobbied100% n=11

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied9%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=63
Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

Lobbied4%
Matched, unlobbied3%

Data table· 4 rows

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11: 46 lobbied and 113 matched unlobbied applications in 26 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	46	—	100% (n=3)	0%	9%	0.09
Matched, unlobbied	113	—	100% (n=11)	0%	2%	0.02

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	449	—	100% (n=63)	0%	4%	0.07
Matched, unlobbied	1,236	—	97% (n=98)	3%	3%	0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.