lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 238620 NNY 18 OZ

43 Finchurst Dr; 221 Finch Ave W; 223 Finch Ave W; 225 Finch Ave W; 227 Finch Ave W; 229 Finch Ave W; 231 Finch Ave W; 235 Finch Ave W; 237 Finch Ave W

Status
Under Review
In progress
Submitted
12 December 2022
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
15
4 meetings · 1 office

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
43 Finchurst Dr; 221 Finch Ave W; 223 Finch Ave W; 225 Finch Ave W; 227 Finch Ave W; 229 Finch Ave W; 231 Finch Ave W; 235 Finch Ave W; 237 Finch Ave W
Ward
Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted
12 December 2022
Status
Under Review
Outcome recorded
In progress
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
122 units; 11,646 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Zoning By-law Amendment for 7 blocks (A-F) of 3 connected buildings at 4 storeys each. There will be 122 units in the buildings will range from 1-4 bedrooms. The development has an FSI of 1.92 and a gross floor area of 11,645.69m2.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 15 communications · 4 meetings · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Lily ChengCouncillor staff11323 July 2025
Lily ChengMember of council4123 July 2025

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

37 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=8
  • Matched, unlobbied64% n=5

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied36%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied24%
  • Matched, unlobbied16%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=78
  • Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied12%
  • Matched, unlobbied14%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 37 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied37—100% (n=8)0%24%0.00
Matched, unlobbied63—64% (n=5)36%16%0.04
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied571—100% (n=78)0%12%0.08
Matched, unlobbied760—96% (n=78)4%14%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.