Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 229719 STE 13 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 15 November 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 295 Jarvis St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 15 November 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 618 units; 44,530 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 22 229720 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with a 60-storey residential building with a 9-storey podium along Jarvis Street. Overall, the proposal consists of a total of 44,530 square metres of gross floor area. The proposed building will contain a total of 618 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 295 Jarvis LPSM36610 · 7 May 2025 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- 295 Jarvis LPSM36006 · 8 October 2024 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- CentreCourtSM35579 · 14 May 2024 · “295 Jarvis St”
- 295 Jarvis LPSM35315 · 14 February 2024 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- 295 Jarvis LPSM35317 · 14 February 2024 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- CentreCourt Developments Inc.SM34746 · 23 August 2023 · “295 Jarvis Street.”
- CentreCourtSM34440 · 24 April 2023 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27951 · 2 April 2019 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM27911 · 22 March 2019 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- Minto Communities Inc.SM25411 · 8 December 2017 · “295 Jarvis Street”
- MUCI ACQ Inc.SM23549 · 22 September 2016 · “295 Jarvis Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.