Address · Ward 13 · Chris Moise
295 Jarvis St
About this address
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Location
- 43.65890, -79.37478
- How this address was located
- Matched exactly to a City of Toronto address point.
Sources: City of Toronto Lobbyist Registry, Development Applications, Committee of Adjustment Applications and Address Points (open data). Lobbyist Registry · Development Applications · Committee of Adjustment · Address Points
Email alerts · at most one a day
Registrations that mention this address
11These registrations name this address in their particulars, after the address was standardised (street type and direction abbreviations). This is a text match, not an inferred link.
Registrations by communications
Top 8Offices contacted on registrations that mention this address
Data table· 14 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 23 | 4 | 8 May 2025 |
| Create TO | Local board | 11 | 1 | 2 May 2025 |
| Development Review Division | City staff | 9 | 1 | 7 January 2026 |
| Councillor Kristyn Wong-Tam | Councillor staff | 5 | 0 | 14 July 2020 |
| Councillor Wong Tam | Councillor staff | 5 | 1 | 14 July 2020 |
| Office of Councillor Wong-Tam, Ward 13 | Councillor staff | 5 | 2 | 23 September 2020 |
| Legal Services | City staff | 3 | 2 | 8 October 2024 |
| Mayor's Office | Councillor staff | 3 | 3 | 5 April 2019 |
| Ward 27 Toronto Centre-Rosedale | Member of council | 3 | 3 | 10 January 2018 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 2 | 1 | 15 May 2019 |
| Ward 13 Toronto Centre | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 24 September 2020 |
| Chris Moise | Member of council | 2 | 1 | 15 May 2024 |
| Olivia Chow | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 8 May 2025 |
| John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 26 March 2019 |
All registrations· 11 rows
| Registration | Client | As written | Subject matter | Dates | Communications |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SM36610 | 295 Jarvis LP | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 7 May 2025 – 31 May 2027 | 0 |
| SM36006 | 295 Jarvis LP | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 8 October 2024 – 31 December 2024 | 3 |
| SM35579 | CentreCourt | 295 Jarvis St | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 May 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 1 |
| SM35315 | 295 Jarvis LP | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 February 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 45 |
| SM35317 | 295 Jarvis LP | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application; Planning and Development Application, Zoning By-law | 14 February 2024 – 31 December 2026 | 0 |
| SM34746 | CentreCourt Developments Inc. | 295 Jarvis Street. | By-law / Regulation; Planning and Development; Planning and Development Application | 23 August 2023 – 5 September 2025 | 1 |
| SM34440 | CentreCourt | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development Application | 24 April 2023 – 29 December 2023 | 0 |
| SM27951 | Minto Communities Inc. | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 2 April 2019 – 2 April 2027 | 12 |
| SM27911 | Minto Communities Inc. | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 March 2019 – 25 April 2019 | 1 |
| SM25411 | Minto Communities Inc. | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 8 December 2017 – 31 December 2021 | 12 |
| SM23549 | MUCI ACQ Inc. | 295 Jarvis Street | Planning and Development, Combined Application | 22 September 2016 – 29 September 2021 | 1 |
Development and Committee of Adjustment applications at this address
3- Submitted 15 November 2022Site Plan Approval (SA)Development application 22 229719 STE 13 SAUnder Review · In progress
- Submitted 15 November 2022Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 22 229720 STE 13 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted 18 May 2018Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)Development application 18 161787 STE 27 OZClosed · Closed (outcome not recorded)
Data table· 3 rows
| Application | Type | Submitted | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22 229719 STE 13 SA Development application | Site Plan Approval (SA) | 15 November 2022 | Under Review In progress |
| 22 229720 STE 13 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 15 November 2022 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
| 18 161787 STE 27 OZ Development application | Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ) | 18 May 2018 | Closed Closed (outcome not recorded) |
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
295 Jarvis St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 229720 STE 13 OZ · submitted 15 November 2022 · Closed · from registration SM34746 (CentreCourt Developments Inc.)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.75
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34746: Zoning by-law amendment for proposed site development located at 295 Jarvis Street. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 229720 STE 13 OZ at 295 Jarvis St: Proposal to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with a 36-storey residential building containing a total of 414 dwelling units (33 replacement rental units and 381 new units). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Zoning by-law amendment for proposed site development located at 295 Jarvis Street.
Matched fields
- address
- 295 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 295 JARVIS ST
295 Jarvis St · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
22 229720 STE 13 OZ · submitted 15 November 2022 · Closed · from registration SM35579 (CentreCourt)
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35579: 295 Jarvis St - Toronto, ON M5B 2C2 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 229720 STE 13 OZ at 295 Jarvis St: Proposal to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with a 36-storey residential building containing a total of 414 dwelling units (33 replacement rental units and 381 new units). (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 295 Jarvis St - Toronto, ON M5B 2C2
Matched fields
- address
- 295 JARVIS ST
- application_address
- 295 JARVIS ST
Council and committee items naming this address
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.
Development applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
82 lobbied · 96 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 82 | — | 100% (n=13) | 0% | 11% | 0.15 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 96 | — | 90% (n=14) | 10% | 16% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.