lobbyTO

Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 222351 ESC 22 OZ

2950 Birchmount Rd; 3600 Finch Ave E

Status
Closed
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted
26 October 2022
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
1
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
4
1 meeting · 2 offices

Application record

Type
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses
2950 Birchmount Rd; 3600 Finch Ave E
Ward
Ward 22 · Nick Mantas
Submitted
26 October 2022
Status
Closed
Outcome recorded
Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
356 units; 27,179 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Rezoning for proposed 12-storey mixed-use building with a total gross floor area of 27,179 square metres. The proposal includes a total of 356 residential units and 3,150 square metres of office and retail space. Total proposed parking is 363 spaces.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 4 communications · 1 meeting · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Councillor Nick Mantas2
  • Ward 22 Scarborough-Agincourt2
Data table· 2 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Councillor Nick MantasCouncillor staff2018 February 2021
Ward 22 Scarborough-AgincourtMember of council2125 February 2021

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22

6 lobbied · 10 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

  • Lobbied1,925
  • Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=64
  • Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied13%
  • Matched, unlobbied13%
Data table· 4 rows
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 22: 6 lobbied and 10 matched unlobbied applications in 4 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied6Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied10Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied5731,925100% (n=64)0%13%0.08
Matched, unlobbied7631,79398% (n=70)2%13%0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.