Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 205695 ESC 21 OZ
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 19 September 2022
- No appeal recorded
- Communications on linked registrations
- 0
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 126 Bellamy Rd N
- Ward
- Ward 21 · Michael Thompson
- Submitted
- 19 September 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 184 units; 36,573 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Jan. 13, 2025 Proposed 8 storey residential building includes the retention of an existing 16 storey apartment building. The proposed GFA is 12, 285.32sq.m., FSI 1.97. The proposal consist of 184 residential units. Proposed eight storey residential building which includes the retention of an existing sixteen storey apartment building. The proposal is got 12013sqm of GFA, with an FSI of 1.93, totalling 36573sqm GFA and 2.92 FSI across the site. A total of 152sqm of amenity spaces is proposed which includes 367sqm indoor and 385sqm outdoor. The proposal will consist of 182 residential units.
Linked lobbying registrations
No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Better Living HomesSM36869 · 12 August 2025 · “126 Bellamy Road North”
- Better Living HomesSM31613 · 28 April 2021 · “126 Bellamy Road North”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 21
15 lobbied · 21 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 15 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.