Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 198151 STE 11 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 31 August 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 505 University Ave
- Ward
- Ward 11 · Dianne Saxe
- Submitted
- 31 August 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 704 units; 46,683 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 24 118172 STE 11 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
The redevelopment proposes a 64-storey mixed-use building with a 12-storey office podium and is inclusive of four levels of below-grade parking with a total of 171 parking spaces. The redevelopment proposes 704 dwelling units, resulting in a total residential gross floor area (GFA) of 46,683 sq. m., a total of 24,919 sq. m. of office GFA, and a total of 460 sq. m of retail GFA which results in a total Floor Space Index (FSI) of 21.65, pursuant to GFA calculations under By-law 569-2013.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Cartareal Corporation NV · registration SM34062
Redevelopment of 505 University Avenue
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34062: Redevelopment of 505 University Avenue (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 198151 STE 11 SA at 505 University Ave: The redevelopment proposes a 64-storey mixed-use building with a 12-storey office podium and is inclusive of four levels of below-grade parking with a total of 171 parking spaces. The redevelopment proposes 704 dwelling units, resulting in a total residential gross floor area (GFA) of 46,683 sq. m.… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 505 University Avenue
Matched fields
- address
- 505 UNIVERSITY AVE
- application_address
- 505 UNIVERSITY AVE
Cartareal Corporation NV · registration SM33957
An application for rezoning of 505 University Avenue was filed with the City of Toronto in August of 2022 to construct a new 64-storey mixed-use tower containing 704 new dwelling units, a total of 46…
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33957: An application for rezoning of 505 University Avenue was filed with the City of Toronto in August of 2022 to construct a new 64-storey mixed-use tower containing 704 new dwelling units, a total of 46,683 sq. m. of residential gross floor area. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 198151 STE 11 SA at 505 University Ave: The redevelopment proposes a 64-storey mixed-use building with a 12-storey office podium and is inclusive of four levels of below-grade parking with a total of 171 parking spaces. The redevelopment proposes 704 dwelling units, resulting in a total residential gross floor area (GFA) of 46,683 sq. m.… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: An application for rezoning of 505 University Avenue was filed with the City of Toronto in August of 2022 to construct a new 64-storey mixed-use tower containing 704 new dw…
Matched fields
- address
- 505 UNIVERSITY AVE
- application_address
- 505 UNIVERSITY AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 3 communications · 3 meetings · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 2 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dianne Saxe | Member of council | 2 | 2 | 16 January 2023 |
| Dianne Saxe | Councillor staff | 1 | 1 | 16 January 2023 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 11
46 lobbied · 113 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 46 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 9% | 0.09 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 113 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.02 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.