Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 186084 STE 13 OZ
83 Queen St E; 85 Queen St E; 89 Queen St E; 119 Church St; 121 Church St; 123 Church St; 125 Church St; 127 Church St
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 4 August 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 83 Queen St E; 85 Queen St E; 89 Queen St E; 119 Church St; 121 Church St; 123 Church St; 125 Church St; 127 Church St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 4 August 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 690 units; 42,000 m² gross floor area
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for a 59 storey mixed-use building containing 690 dwelling units, 42,000 sqm of residential GFA, and 500 sqm of retail GFA. A Site Plan Application (22 186083 STE 13 SA) has been submitted concurrently with this application.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM35583
119 Church St
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.84
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35583: 119 Church St (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 186084 STE 13 OZ at 119 Church St: Proposal for a 59 storey mixed-use building containing 690 dwelling units, 42,000 sqm of residential GFA, and 500 sqm of retail GFA. A Site Plan Application (22 186083 STE 13 SA) has been submitted concurrently with this application. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 119 Church St
Matched fields
- address
- 119 CHURCH ST
- application_address
- 119 CHURCH ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- CentreCourtSM30630 · 30 September 2020 · “119 Church Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 13
83 lobbied · 97 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
573 lobbied · 763 matchedMedian days
Approval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 83 | — | 100% (n=10) | 0% | 11% | 0.14 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 97 | 1,793 | 93% (n=14) | 7% | 17% | 0.08 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 573 | 1,925 | 100% (n=64) | 0% | 13% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 763 | 1,793 | 98% (n=70) | 2% | 13% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.