Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 168174 NNY 15 SA
383 Cleveland St; 385 Cleveland St; 387 Cleveland St; 389 Cleveland St; 501 Eglinton Ave E; 503 Eglinton Ave E
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 27 June 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 383 Cleveland St; 385 Cleveland St; 387 Cleveland St; 389 Cleveland St; 501 Eglinton Ave E; 503 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 15 · Rachel Chernos Lin
- Submitted
- 27 June 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 217 units; 14,735 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 22 168175 NNY 15 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed development is comprised of a 15-storey mixed-use building ((plus an amenity penthouse level), with 217 dwelling units and 30 underground parking spaces. A total of 14,735 square metres of GFA is proposed, including 461 square metres of commercial GFA. Rezoning application council approved: 22 168175 NNY 15 OZ (By-law 2024-0878)Minor Variance application approved: 25 171584 NNY 15 MV. Approved at the July 10, 2025 Committee of Adjustment.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
389 Cleveland Street LP · registration SM35406
389 Cleveland Street Development Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35406: 389 Cleveland Street Development Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 168174 NNY 15 SA at 501 Eglinton Ave E: Proposed development is comprised of a 15-storey mixed-use building ((plus an amenity penthouse level), with 217 dwelling units and 30 underground parking spaces. A total of 14,735 square metres of GFA is proposed, including 461 square metres of commercial GFA. Rezoning application council approved… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 389 Cleveland Street Development Application
Matched fields
- address
- 389 CLEVELAND ST
- application_address
- 389 CLEVELAND ST
389 Cleveland Street LP · registration SM35407
389 Cleveland Street Development Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.90
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35407: 389 Cleveland Street Development Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 168174 NNY 15 SA at 501 Eglinton Ave E: Proposed development is comprised of a 15-storey mixed-use building ((plus an amenity penthouse level), with 217 dwelling units and 30 underground parking spaces. A total of 14,735 square metres of GFA is proposed, including 461 square metres of commercial GFA. Rezoning application council approved… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 389 Cleveland Street Development Application
Matched fields
- address
- 389 CLEVELAND ST
- application_address
- 389 CLEVELAND ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 28 communications · 1 meeting · 6 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 6 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Development Review Division | City staff | 14 | 0 | 9 May 2025 |
| Olivia Chow | Councillor staff | 6 | 1 | 20 March 2025 |
| Brad Bradford | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 22 July 2024 |
| Jaye Robinson | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 11 April 2024 |
| City Planning | City staff | 1 | 0 | 30 April 2025 |
| Development Review | City staff | 1 | 0 | 2 May 2025 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 389 Cleveland Street LPSM37496 · 16 March 2026 · “389 Cleveland Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 15
12 lobbied · 41 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 12 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 41 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.