Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 144668 WET 03 OZ
2 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 3 Sinclair St; 5 Sinclair St; 7 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 15 Sinclair St; 506 Royal York Rd; 514 Royal York Rd; 516 Royal York Rd; 520 Royal York Rd; 522 Royal York Rd
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- In progress
- Submitted
- 10 May 2022
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 2 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 3 Sinclair St; 5 Sinclair St; 7 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd; 15 Sinclair St; 506 Royal York Rd; 514 Royal York Rd; 516 Royal York Rd; 520 Royal York Rd; 522 Royal York Rd
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 10 May 2022
- Status
- OMB Appeal
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposal for a mixed-use development consisting of three buildings on two parcels
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Craft Development Corporation · registration SM24777
Lobbying POH and Staff to get an advise and guidance on appeal process for 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd (OMB), and to ensure that it fits with the community plan.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.78
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM24777: Lobbying POH and Staff to get an advise and guidance on appeal process for 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd (OMB), and to ensure that it fits with the community plan. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 144668 WET 03 OZ at 2 Queen Elizabeth Blvd: Proposal for a mixed-use development consisting of three buildings on two parcels (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying POH and Staff to get an advise and guidance on appeal process for 10 Queen Elizabeth Blvd (OMB), and to ensure that it fits with the community plan.
Matched fields
- address
- 10 QUEEN ELIZABETH BLVD
- application_address
- 10 QUEEN ELIZABETH BLVD
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 1 row
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ward 5 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 23 June 2017 |
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- 10 QEW Inc.SM24857 · 23 June 2017 · “522 Royal York Road”
- 10 QEW Inc.SM24857 · 23 June 2017 · “2 Queen Elizabeth Boulevard”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3
37 lobbied · 72 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 37 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 16% | 0.27 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 72 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 15% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.