Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 141953 STE 10 SA
- Status
- Appeal Received
- In progress
- Submitted
- 4 May 2022
- Appealed
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 307 Lake Shore Blvd E
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 4 May 2022
- Status
- Appeal Received
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- Yes
- Size stated in the description
- 430 units
- Related file
- 22 141954 STE 10 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Proposed Site Plan approval for a 49-storey (155 m) residential tower containing 430 residential units with one level of non-residential potential community space on the second floor at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East. A related application to amend the Official Plan (Central Waterfront Secondary Plan) and Zoning By-law has been submitted.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Resident · registration SM34129
307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34129: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 141953 STE 10 SA at 307 Lake Shore Blvd E: Proposed Site Plan approval for a 49-storey (155 m) residential tower containing 430 residential units with one level of non-residential potential community space on the second floor at 307 Lake Shore Boulevard East. A related application to amend the Official Plan (Central Waterfront Secondary Pla… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 307 Lake Shore Blvd. E. - Proposed Redevelopment
Matched fields
- address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
- application_address
- 307 LAKE SHORE BLVD E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Plaza PartnersSM34222 · 22 February 2023 · “307 Lake Shore Blvd. East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 10
66 lobbied · 165 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 66 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 3% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 165 | — | 100% (n=11) | 0% | 2% | 0.04 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.