Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 141897 STE 14 SA
80 Knox Ave; 880-882 Eastern Ave
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 4 May 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 80 Knox Ave; 880-882 Eastern Ave
- Ward
- Ward 14 · Paula Fletcher
- Submitted
- 4 May 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 167 units; 13,418 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 21 136166 STE 14 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Approval for a 12-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 268.20 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 13,417.80 square metres. 167 rental dwelling units are proposed.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
TAS · registration SM36420
880 Eastern Ave, site plan approval, minor variance
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM36420: 880 Eastern Ave, site plan approval, minor variance (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 141897 STE 14 SA at 880-882 Eastern Ave: Site Plan Approval for a 12-storey mixed-use building having a non-residential gross floor area of 268.20 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 13,417.80 square metres. 167 rental dwelling units are proposed. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 880 Eastern Ave, site plan approval, minor variance
Matched fields
- address
- 880 EASTERN AVE
- application_address
- 880-882 EASTERN AVE
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 14
17 lobbied · 35 matchedHidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 17 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Matched, unlobbied | 35 | Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group. | ||||
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.