Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 140038 STE 09 SA
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 1799 St Clair Ave W
- Ward
- Ward 9 · Alejandra Bravo
- Submitted
- 29 April 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 1,174 units; 93,034 m² gross floor area
- Related file
- 21 196875 STE 09 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan approval application to facilitate the development of the site for 3 mixed-use towers having a proposed non-residential gross floor area of 10,699 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area of 93,034 square metres. A total of 1174 residential dwelling units are proposed
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Sequoia Grove Homes · registration SM33077
Discussion with public office holder on the development applications for 1799 St. Clair Avenue West, Keele and St. Clair Study and related matters.
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.82
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM33077: Discussion with public office holder on the development applications for 1799 St. Clair Avenue West, Keele and St. Clair Study and related matters. (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 140038 STE 09 SA at 1799 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan approval application to facilitate the development of the site for 3 mixed-use towers having a proposed non-residential gross floor area of 10,699 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area of 93,034 square metres. A total of 1174 residential dwelling units are proposed (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Discussion with public office holder on the development applications for 1799 St. Clair Avenue West, Keele and St. Clair Study and related matters.
Matched fields
- address
- 1799 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 1799 ST CLAIR AVE W
Sequoia Grove Homes · registration SM31892
1799 St Clair Avenue West- Delta Bingo - redevelopment of the site including rezoning and site plan approval for a mixed use residential development
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.71
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31892: 1799 St Clair Avenue West- Delta Bingo - redevelopment of the site including rezoning and site plan approval for a mixed use residential development (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 140038 STE 09 SA at 1799 St Clair Ave W: Site Plan approval application to facilitate the development of the site for 3 mixed-use towers having a proposed non-residential gross floor area of 10,699 square metres, and the proposed residential gross floor area of 93,034 square metres. A total of 1174 residential dwelling units are proposed (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 1799 St Clair Avenue West- Delta Bingo - redevelopment of the site including rezoning and site plan approval for a mixed use residential developm…
Matched fields
- address
- 1799 ST CLAIR AVE W
- application_address
- 1799 ST CLAIR AVE W
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Sequoia Grove HomesSM32042 · 2 July 2021 · “1799 St. Clair Avenue West.”
- Sequoia Stockyards LPSM31887 · 22 June 2021 · “1799 St. Clair Avenue West”
- Sequoia Grove HomesSM31445 · 15 March 2021 · “1799 St. Clair Ave. W.”
- Sequoia Grove HomesSM31346 · 5 March 2021 · “1799 St Clair Ave W”
- Sequoia Grove HomesSM31268 · 5 February 2021 · “1799 St. Clair Avenue West”
- Sequoia Grove HomesSM31169 · 22 January 2021 · “1799 St. Clair Avenue West”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 9
20 lobbied · 21 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 20 | — | 100% (n=4) | 0% | 0% | 0.05 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 21 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 0% | 0.10 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.