Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 139836 WET 03 OZ

4884 Dundas St W; 4884-4886 Dundas St W; 4886 Dundas St W; 4888 Dundas St W; 4890 Dundas St W; 4894 Dundas St W

Ward 3 · Amber MorleyDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 28 April 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 3 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 4884 Dundas St W; 4884-4886 Dundas St W; 4886 Dundas St W; 4888 Dundas St W; 4890 Dundas St W; 4894 Dundas St W
Ward: Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted: 28 April 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 398 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for a 25-storey mixed-use building that includes 398 dwelling units and 4,817 square metres of institutional space with a conservation strategy for the relocation of the Musson House within the property parcel.Settlement Proposal to permit a 25-storey residential tower with at-grade retail use. This is a combined Official Plan Amendment and Rezoning Application.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Rockport Group · registration SM33122
Community Engagement services for 4884-4896 Dundas St. W
Evidence High confidence · score 0.92
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM33122: Community Engagement services for 4884-4896 Dundas St. W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139836 WET 03 OZ at 4888 Dundas St W: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for a 25-storey mixed-use building that includes 398 dwelling units and 4,817 square metres of institutional space with a conservation strategy for the relocation of the Musson House within the property parcel.Settlement Proposal to permit a 25-storey resid… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Community Engagement services for 4884-4896 Dundas St. W
Matched fields
address
4884-4896 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
4884-4886 DUNDAS ST W
Rockport Homes Limited · registration SM32421
Redevelopment of 4884-4896 Dundas St W
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.81
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32421: Redevelopment of 4884-4896 Dundas St W (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139836 WET 03 OZ at 4888 Dundas St W: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment for a 25-storey mixed-use building that includes 398 dwelling units and 4,817 square metres of institutional space with a conservation strategy for the relocation of the Musson House within the property parcel.Settlement Proposal to permit a 25-storey resid… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Redevelopment of 4884-4896 Dundas St W
Matched fields
address
4884-4896 DUNDAS ST W
application_address
4884-4886 DUNDAS ST W

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 3 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Councillor Mark Grimes6
Office of Councillor Mark Grimes1

Data table· 2 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Councillor Mark Grimes	Councillor staff	6	2	6 April 2022
Office of Councillor Mark Grimes	Councillor staff	1	1	6 April 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Amir Remtulla and Associates1 registration
Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3

37 lobbied · 72 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=4
Matched, unlobbied100% n=6

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied16%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 3: 37 lobbied and 72 matched unlobbied applications in 25 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	37	—	100% (n=4)	0%	16%	0.27
Matched, unlobbied	72	—	100% (n=6)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.