Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 139720 WET 03 SA
8 Jopling Ave S; 10 Jopling Ave S; 12 Jopling Ave S; 14 Jopling Ave S; 16 Jopling Ave S; 18 Jopling Ave S; 22 Jopling Ave S; 24 Jopling Ave S; 26 Jopling Ave S
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Approved
- Submitted
- 28 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 8 Jopling Ave S; 10 Jopling Ave S; 12 Jopling Ave S; 14 Jopling Ave S; 16 Jopling Ave S; 18 Jopling Ave S; 22 Jopling Ave S; 24 Jopling Ave S; 26 Jopling Ave S
- Ward
- Ward 3 · Amber Morley
- Submitted
- 28 April 2022
- Status
- NOAC Issued
- Outcome recorded
- Approved
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 746 units
- Related file
- 19 252405 WET 03 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Site Plan Control application proposing a mixed-use development consisting of a 29- and 38- storey towers connected by a six-storey base building to be constructed in two phases. A development is comprised of 746 dwelling units, 461 square metres of commercial space and 478 square metres of community agency space. A total of 379 parking spaces, including two pick-up and drop-off parking spaces are also proposed
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
CentreCourt · registration SM35582
5-9 Jopling Ave S
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.72
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35582: 5-9 Jopling Ave S (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139720 WET 03 SA at 8 Jopling Ave S: Site Plan Control application proposing a mixed-use development consisting of a 29- and 38- storey towers connected by a six-storey base building to be constructed in two phases. A development is comprised of 746 dwelling units, 461 square metres of commercial space and 478 square metres of communi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 5-9 Jopling Ave S
Matched fields
- address
- 5-9 JOPLING AVE S
- application_address
- 8 JOPLING AVE S
Amdev (Jopling) LP & Amdev (Jopling South) LP · registration SM30528
Lobbying on behalf of client regarding a proposed two tower 35-storey and 38-storey development at 8-26 Jopling Avenue South, Etobicoke ON M9B 2P5
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.86
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM30528: Lobbying on behalf of client regarding a proposed two tower 35-storey and 38-storey development at 8-26 Jopling Avenue South, Etobicoke ON M9B 2P5 (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 139720 WET 03 SA at 8 Jopling Ave S: Site Plan Control application proposing a mixed-use development consisting of a 29- and 38- storey towers connected by a six-storey base building to be constructed in two phases. A development is comprised of 746 dwelling units, 461 square metres of commercial space and 478 square metres of communi… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Lobbying on behalf of client regarding a proposed two tower 35-storey and 38-storey development at 8-26 Jopling Avenue South, Etobicoke ON M9B 2P5
Matched fields
- address
- 8-26 JOPLING AVE S
- application_address
- 8 JOPLING AVE S
Lobbying on linked registrations
2 linked registrations · 34 communications · 7 meetings · 8 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 8 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 15 | 2 | 25 October 2021 |
| Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore | Member of council | 6 | 1 | 4 January 2022 |
| Councillor Stephen Holyday | Councillor staff | 4 | 1 | 10 August 2021 |
| CreateTO | Local board | 3 | 0 | 11 December 2020 |
| Councillor Mark Grimes | Councillor staff | 2 | 2 | 29 September 2021 |
| Ward 9 Davenport | Member of council | 2 | 0 | 14 December 2020 |
| Councillor Ana Bailão | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 9 December 2020 |
| Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre | Member of council | 1 | 1 | 1 December 2020 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3
24 lobbied · 100 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 24 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 4% | 0.25 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 100 | — | 71% (n=10) | 29% | 4% | 0.14 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.