lobbyTO

Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)

Development application 22 139720 WET 03 SA

8 Jopling Ave S; 10 Jopling Ave S; 12 Jopling Ave S; 14 Jopling Ave S; 16 Jopling Ave S; 18 Jopling Ave S; 22 Jopling Ave S; 24 Jopling Ave S; 26 Jopling Ave S

Status
NOAC Issued
Approved
Submitted
28 April 2022
No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations
2
Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations
34
7 meetings · 8 offices

Application record

Type
Site Plan Approval (SA)
Addresses
8 Jopling Ave S; 10 Jopling Ave S; 12 Jopling Ave S; 14 Jopling Ave S; 16 Jopling Ave S; 18 Jopling Ave S; 22 Jopling Ave S; 24 Jopling Ave S; 26 Jopling Ave S
Ward
Ward 3 · Amber Morley
Submitted
28 April 2022
Status
NOAC Issued
Outcome recorded
Approved
Decision date
Not recorded in the open data
Appealed
No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description
746 units
Related file
19 252405 WET 03 OZ

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Site Plan Control application proposing a mixed-use development consisting of a 29- and 38- storey towers connected by a six-storey base building to be constructed in two phases. A development is comprised of 746 dwelling units, 461 square metres of commercial space and 478 square metres of community agency space. A total of 379 parking spaces, including two pick-up and drop-off parking spaces are also proposed

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 34 communications · 7 meetings · 8 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations
  • Mayor John Tory15
  • Ward 3 Etobicoke-Lakeshore6
  • Councillor Stephen Holyday4
  • CreateTO3
  • Councillor Mark Grimes2
  • Ward 9 Davenport2
  • Councillor Ana Bailão1
  • Ward 2 Etobicoke Centre1
Data table· 8 rows
OfficeOffice holder typeCommunicationsMeetingsLast contact
Mayor John ToryCouncillor staff15225 October 2021
Ward 3 Etobicoke-LakeshoreMember of council614 January 2022
Councillor Stephen HolydayCouncillor staff4110 August 2021
CreateTOLocal board3011 December 2020
Councillor Mark GrimesCouncillor staff2229 September 2021
Ward 9 DavenportMember of council2014 December 2020
Councillor Ana BailãoCouncillor staff109 December 2020
Ward 2 Etobicoke CentreMember of council111 December 2020

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3

24 lobbied · 100 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=5
  • Matched, unlobbied71% n=10

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied29%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied4%

Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide

449 lobbied · 1,236 matched

Approval rate

  • Lobbied100% n=63
  • Matched, unlobbied97% n=98

Refusal rate

  • Lobbied0%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%

Appeal rate

  • Lobbied4%
  • Matched, unlobbied3%
Data table· 4 rows
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 3: 24 lobbied and 100 matched unlobbied applications in 18 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied24—100% (n=5)0%4%0.25
Matched, unlobbied100—71% (n=10)29%4%0.14
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide: 449 lobbied and 1,236 matched unlobbied applications in 307 matched strata
GroupnMedian daysApproval rateRefusal rateAppeal rateCouncil items
Lobbied449—100% (n=63)0%4%0.07
Matched, unlobbied1,236—97% (n=98)3%3%0.04

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.