Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Development application 22 138740 STE 10 OZ
78 Spadina Ave; 460 King St W; 464 King St W; 468 King St W
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 26 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
- Addresses
- 78 Spadina Ave; 460 King St W; 464 King St W; 468 King St W
- Ward
- Ward 10 · Ausma Malik
- Submitted
- 26 April 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Zoning By-law Amendment for a 23-storey (98.6 metres including the mechanical penthouse) non-residential building with retail at-grade and office above. The listed heritage property at 460 King Street West is proposed to be retained while the facade of the listed heritage property at 468 King Street is to be retained. Concurrent SA application: 22 138739 STE 10 SA
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Allied REIT · registration SM35186
460 King Street West Zoning and Site Plan Application
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.88
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM35186: 460 King Street West Zoning and Site Plan Application (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 138740 STE 10 OZ at 78 Spadina Ave: Zoning By-law Amendment for a 23-storey (98.6 metres including the mechanical penthouse) non-residential building with retail at-grade and office above. The listed heritage property at 460 King Street West is proposed to be retained while the facade of the listed heritage property at 468 King Stree… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 460 King Street West Zoning and Site Plan Application
Matched fields
- address
- 460 KING ST W
- application_address
- 460 KING ST W
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Other registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
None.
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 10
88 lobbied · 94 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide
571 lobbied · 760 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 88 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 10% | 0.03 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 94 | — | 100% (n=7) | 0% | 5% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 571 | — | 100% (n=78) | 0% | 12% | 0.08 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 760 | — | 96% (n=78) | 4% | 14% | 0.05 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.