Development application · Site Plan Approval (SA)
Development application 22 132974 STE 13 SA
9 Isabella St; 619 Yonge St; 625 Yonge St
- Status
- Under Review
- In progress
- Submitted
- 11 April 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Site Plan Approval (SA)
- Addresses
- 9 Isabella St; 619 Yonge St; 625 Yonge St
- Ward
- Ward 13 · Chris Moise
- Submitted
- 11 April 2022
- Status
- Under Review
- Outcome recorded
- In progress
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 606 units
- Related file
- 21 234490 STE 13 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
57-storey mixed-use building with 3,134 square metres of non-residential space and 606 dwelling units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
YI Developments Limited · registration SM34233
Development Application for 619-637 Yonge Street
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.80
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34233: Development Application for 619-637 Yonge Street (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 132974 STE 13 SA at 619 Yonge St: 57-storey mixed-use building with 3,134 square metres of non-residential space and 606 dwelling units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Development Application for 619-637 Yonge Street
Matched fields
- address
- 619-637 YONGE ST
- application_address
- 619 YONGE ST
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 0 communications · 0 meetings · 0 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsNo communications recorded.
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- YI Developments LimitedSM21485 · 25 February 2015 · “625 Yonge Street”
- YI Developments LimitedSM21485 · 25 February 2015 · “9 Isabella Street”
- YI Developments LimitedSM20206 · 21 March 2014 · “625 Yonge Street”
- YI Developments LimitedSM20206 · 21 March 2014 · “9 Isabella Street”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Site Plan Approval (SA), Ward 13
56 lobbied · 128 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Site Plan Approval (SA), City-wide
449 lobbied · 1,236 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 4 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 56 | — | 100% (n=5) | 0% | 7% | 0.16 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 128 | — | 100% (n=8) | 0% | 2% | 0.01 |
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 449 | — | 100% (n=63) | 0% | 4% | 0.07 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 1,236 | — | 97% (n=98) | 3% | 3% | 0.04 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.