Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 22 125367 ESC 24 OZ

0 Kingston Rd; 4206 Kingston Rd; 4208 Kingston Rd; 4212 Kingston Rd

Ward 24 · Paul AinslieDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Closed; Closed (outcome not recorded)
Submitted: 22 March 2022; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 2; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 7; 0 meetings · 2 offices

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 0 Kingston Rd; 4206 Kingston Rd; 4208 Kingston Rd; 4212 Kingston Rd
Ward: Ward 24 · Paul Ainslie
Submitted: 22 March 2022
Status: Closed
Outcome recorded: Closed (outcome not recorded)
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 271 units

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Proposal for a development consisting of an 11-storey mixed-use building with retail uses at grade and residential uses above and a seven-storey residential building with both at-grade and below-grade parking and at-grade outdoor amenity. The proposed development includes 271 residential units.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Angil Developments · registration SM34134
development at 4206-4212 Kingston Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.73
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM34134: development at 4206-4212 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 125367 ESC 24 OZ at 4212 Kingston Rd: Proposal for a development consisting of an 11-storey mixed-use building with retail uses at grade and residential uses above and a seven-storey residential building with both at-grade and below-grade parking and at-grade outdoor amenity. The proposed development includes 271 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: development at 4206-4212 Kingston Road
Matched fields
address
4206-4212 KINGSTON RD
application_address
4206 KINGSTON RD
2687525 Ontario Inc. · registration SM31672
4206-4212 Kingston Road
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.89
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM31672: 4206-4212 Kingston Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 125367 ESC 24 OZ at 4212 Kingston Rd: Proposal for a development consisting of an 11-storey mixed-use building with retail uses at grade and residential uses above and a seven-storey residential building with both at-grade and below-grade parking and at-grade outdoor amenity. The proposed development includes 271 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: 4206-4212 Kingston Road
Matched fields
address
4206-4212 KINGSTON RD
application_address
4206 KINGSTON RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

2 linked registrations · 7 communications · 0 meetings · 2 offices contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Paul Ainslie3
Paul Ainslie3
Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood1

Data table· 3 rows

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Last contact
Paul Ainslie	Councillor staff	3	15 February 2023
Paul Ainslie	Member of council	3	15 February 2023
Ward 24 Scarborough-Guildwood	Member of council	1	20 June 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

GTA Strategies2 registrations

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

None.

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24

8 lobbied · 7 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 24: 8 lobbied and 7 matched unlobbied applications in 5 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.