Development application · Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
Development application 22 106334 ESC 20 CD
- Status
- Closed
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Submitted
- 21 January 2022
- No appeal recorded
Application record
- Type
- Draft Plan of Condominium (CD)
- Addresses
- 2787 Eglinton Ave E
- Ward
- Ward 20 · Parthi Kandavel
- Submitted
- 21 January 2022
- Status
- Closed
- Outcome recorded
- Closed (outcome not recorded)
- Decision date
- Not recorded in the open data
- Appealed
- No appeal recorded
- Size stated in the description
- 182 units
- Related file
- 18 140669 ESC 35 OZ
Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page
Description
Draft Plan of Condo Application 182 6 blocks of 4-storey stacked townhouses containing 182 residential units.
Linked lobbying registrations
These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.
Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored
Mattamy (Danforth) Limited · registration SM32246
Delay with issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions - 2787 Eglinton Avenue East
Evidence Moderate confidence · score 0.76
A model scored this link between 0.7 and 0.9 out of 1. Links are not checked by a person, and links in this range are wrong more often: check the evidence before relying on it.
Source records
- Registration SM32246: Delay with issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions - 2787 Eglinton Avenue East (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 22 106334 ESC 20 CD at 2787 Eglinton Ave E: Draft Plan of Condo Application 182 6 blocks of 4-storey stacked townhouses containing 182 residential units. (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Delay with issuance of Notice of Approval Conditions - 2787 Eglinton Avenue East
Matched fields
- address
- 2787 EGLINTON AVE E
- application_address
- 2787 EGLINTON AVE E
Lobbying on linked registrations
1 linked registration · 12 communications · 0 meetings · 5 offices contacted
Offices contacted
Linked registrationsData table· 5 rows
| Office | Office holder type | Communications | Meetings | Last contact |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Toronto Water | City staff | 3 | 0 | 11 March 2024 |
| Councillor Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 6 October 2021 |
| Gary Crawford | Councillor staff | 3 | 0 | 29 March 2023 |
| Deputy City Manager, Infrastructure Services | City staff | 2 | 0 | 11 March 2024 |
| Mayor John Tory | Councillor staff | 1 | 0 | 3 March 2022 |
Consultant firms
Linked registrationsOther registrations that mention this application's addresses
Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.
- Mattamy Homes LimitedSM27155 · 13 December 2018 · “2787 Eglinton Ave East”
- Core Development Group Ltd.SM24944 · 14 August 2017 · “2787 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Pemberton Group Inc.SM24626 · 29 May 2017 · “2787 Eglinton Avenue East”
- Astral Media Outdoor, L.P.SM21719 · 27 April 2015 · “2787 Eglinton Avenue East”
Comparison with similar applications
Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.
Draft Plan of Condominium (CD), City-wide
28 lobbied · 95 matchedApproval rate
Refusal rate
Appeal rate
Data table· 2 rows
| Group | n | Median days | Approval rate | Refusal rate | Appeal rate | Council items |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lobbied | 28 | — | 100% (n=3) | 0% | 0% | 0.04 |
| Matched, unlobbied | 95 | — | 100% (n=6) | 0% | 0% | 0.03 |
Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.
Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.
Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.