Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 251925 WET 07 OZ

1 Fountainhead Rd; 35 Fountainhead Rd; 40 Fountainhead Rd; 470 Sentinel Rd

Ward 7 · Anthony PerruzzaDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: Under Review; In progress
Submitted: 29 December 2021; No appeal recorded
Linked lobbying registrations: 1; Inferred links, published
Communications on linked registrations: 1; 1 meeting · 1 office

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 1 Fountainhead Rd; 35 Fountainhead Rd; 40 Fountainhead Rd; 470 Sentinel Rd
Ward: Ward 7 · Anthony Perruzza
Submitted: 29 December 2021
Status: Under Review
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: No appeal recorded
Size stated in the description: 1,740 units; 131,966 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for four mixed-use and residential apartment buildings and a recreation centre having heights of 40 storeys (125.5 metres), 36 storeys (112.85 metres), 30 storeys (95.45 metres), 14 storeys (47.65 metres) and 2 storeys (11.9 metres). The proposal will total approximately 131,966 square metres of residential gross floor area, 1,910 square metres of retail gross floor area and include 1,740 dwelling units. The four existing 22-storey apartment buildings currently on the subject site will be retained.

Linked lobbying registrations

These links are inferred by lobbyTO from file numbers and addresses named in the registration (task L2); the registry does not record which application a registration concerns.

Links between records are inferred by a model and are not reviewed by a person. Each link shows its score out of 1; moderate-confidence links (0.7 to 0.9) are wrong more often than high-confidence links. How links are scored

Ranee Management · registration SM32852
Planning and Development Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Plan of Subdivision Applications for site located at 470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35 and 40 Fountainhead Road
Evidence High confidence · score 0.91
A model scored this link 0.9 or higher out of 1. Links are not checked by a person; links scored this high are usually right but can be wrong.
Source records
- Registration SM32852: Planning and Development Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Plan of Subdivision Applications for site located at 470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35 and 40 Fountainhead Road (Lobbyist Registry)
- Development application 21 251925 WET 07 OZ at 470 Sentinel Rd: Official Plan and Zoning By-law Amendment application to facilitate the redevelopment of the site for four mixed-use and residential apartment buildings and a recreation centre having heights of 40 storeys (125.5 metres), 36 storeys (112.85 metres), 30 storeys (95.45 metres), 14 storeys (47.65 metr… (Development Applications)
Matched text
- particulars: Planning and Development Official Plan Amendment, Rezoning and Plan of Subdivision Applications for site located at 470 Sentinel Road and 1, 35 and 40 Fountainhead Road
Matched fields
address
470 SENTINEL RD
application_address
470 SENTINEL RD

Lobbying on linked registrations

1 linked registration · 1 communication · 1 meeting · 1 office contacted

Offices contacted

Linked registrations

Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek1

Data table· 1 row

Office	Office holder type	Communications	Meetings	Last contact
Ward 7 Humber River-Black Creek	Member of council	1	1	19 January 2022

Consultant firms

Linked registrations

Bousfields Inc.1 registration

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

EL-AD GROUP (CANADA) INC
SM10268 · 11 February 2008 · “40 Fountainhead Road”
EL-AD GROUP (CANADA) INC
SM10268 · 11 February 2008 · “470 Sentinel Road”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7

7 lobbied · 8 matched

Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

571 lobbied · 760 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=78
Matched, unlobbied96% n=78

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied4%

Appeal rate

Lobbied12%
Matched, unlobbied14%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 7: 7 lobbied and 8 matched unlobbied applications in 7 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	7	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.
Matched, unlobbied	8	Hidden: fewer than 20 applications in the lobbied or the matched unlobbied group.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 571 lobbied and 760 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	571	—	100% (n=78)	0%	12%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	760	—	96% (n=78)	4%	14%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.