Development application · Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)

Development application 21 246686 NNY 18 OZ

Ward 18 · Lily ChengDataset pageCity application pageReport an error on this page

Status: OMB Appeal; In progress
Submitted: 9 December 2021; Appealed
Linked lobbying registrations: 0; None published
Communications on linked registrations: 0

Application record

Type: Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ)
Addresses: 6464 Yonge St
Ward: Ward 18 · Lily Cheng
Submitted: 9 December 2021
Status: OMB Appeal
Outcome recorded: In progress
Decision date: Not recorded in the open data
Appealed: Yes
Size stated in the description: 635,766 m² gross floor area

Source: City of Toronto open data (Development Applications; Committee of Adjustment Applications). Dataset page · City application page

Description

To propose an Official Plan Amendment to facilitate the redevelopment of the site with buildings ranging from 4-50 storeys in height, and having a proposed non-residential gross floor area of 29,514 square metres, and a residential gross floor area of 635,766 square metres at the CenterPoint Mall located at 6212 - 6600 Yonge Street. The mall would be demolished over several years. A network of new public and private streets and development blocks containing a mix of uses including residential, retail, office, a central public park, and privately-owned publically accessible spaces are also proposed. This application is partly intended to inform the City of Toronto's Yonge Street North Planning Study.

Linked lobbying registrations

No published lobbying registrations are linked to this application.

Other registrations that mention this application's addresses

Text matches on the address only. They are not linked to this application unless listed above.

Morguard Real Estate Ownership, Management and Investment
SM31689 · 17 May 2021 · “6464 Yonge St”

Comparison with similar applications

Lobbied applications are compared only with unlobbied applications of the same type, in the same ward, submitted in the same year and of the same size band (units or floor area from the description; sub-type for Committee of Adjustment files). Unlobbied applications are weighted to match the lobbied group. Raw lobbied versus unlobbied averages are not reported.

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18

38 lobbied · 63 matched

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=7
Matched, unlobbied100% n=3

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied0%

Appeal rate

Lobbied21%
Matched, unlobbied15%

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide

573 lobbied · 763 matched

Median days

Lobbied1,925
Matched, unlobbied1,793

Approval rate

Lobbied100% n=64
Matched, unlobbied98% n=70

Refusal rate

Lobbied0%
Matched, unlobbied2%

Appeal rate

Lobbied13%
Matched, unlobbied13%

Data table· 4 rows

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), Ward 18: 38 lobbied and 63 matched unlobbied applications in 23 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	38	—	100% (n=7)	0%	21%	0.00
Matched, unlobbied	63	—	100% (n=3)	0%	15%	0.04

Official Plan or Zoning By-law Amendment (OZ), City-wide: 573 lobbied and 763 matched unlobbied applications in 344 matched strata
Group	n	Median days	Approval rate	Refusal rate	Appeal rate	Council items
Lobbied	573	1,925	100% (n=64)	0%	13%	0.08
Matched, unlobbied	763	1,793	98% (n=70)	2%	13%	0.05

Submission to the first decision status seen in our daily loads (measured from launch). Approval and refusal rates are among applications with a recorded decision.

Large and complex applications attract both lobbying and longer reviews, and matching cannot remove every difference between applications, so a difference does not show that lobbying changed how an application was reviewed.

Lobbyists choose whom to contact, so a difference does not show a change of mind.